![]() ![]() The characters behavior isn't believable, the plot leads nowhere, Melanie Griffith - that shows occasionally some of her seductive side - mostly goes through the scenes like a sleepwalker and her various criminal connections are so evident that it's not believable that no one tries to incriminate her for the killings. and still the police isn't interested to investigate her involvement with the murder. Subsequently she tries to be recognized as the murdered rich man's wife in order to get his inheritance. But no one cares it seems that because she was at home she could not be related in any ways to the murdering of the man that dumped her only days before. Wells out of his office, causing her to seriously threaten him. There was even a witness that saw an angry Mr Vierra expelling Mrs. But the man was murdered with a heavy stick that smashed his head: so why does everyone only consider the hypothesis that she performed the assassination with her own hands? Since the start everyone knows that the woman is a manipulator, so the first logical thing to do was to suspect her as the crime sender. ![]() Vierra (the rich Griffith lover) is killed no one investigates her only because at the murdering hour she was at home with her assistant. ![]() But I don't blame her too much because the plot is ridiculous and the plot holes are bigger than Mount Everest. Usually she is a great actress and a very seductive woman, but here the way she portrays the bad lawyer doesn't work. I was really surprised to see Melanie Griffith into this very modest flick. Reviewed by guidomaschio 3 / 10 Half noir and half cheese ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
February 2023
Categories |